Been
But 2014 is going to be AWESOME!
Librarianship is not dead. And i'm maybe going to write about it every once in a while.
No promises.
You've sat through all the classes and jumped through all the hoops, and then got yourself a big kid job! Excellent! Now you get to read about it. In Detail!
More often than not, when I go into the Library, I have no clue what I want to read. Most times I'll set out at least an hour of time so that I can thoroughly browse every nook and cranny of the building. Recently though, I've discovered two really great online book blogs that have given me some really awesome ideas for books.
The first one is NPR's book blog [www.npr.org/books]. I found out about it on a drive home from work. Let me just point out that the people of NPR are really good at making some awesome reading lists. This summer, they've been doing a blog series of summer reads, ranging from the 100 best thrillers to great "laugh out loud" books for the beach. This last weeks was particularly interesting, because it featured nonfiction books to drag us "back to reality" for the end of summer. Another great piece that the NPR blog features are interviews with authors where we the listener find out what these popular authors have recently been reading. They also have all the reviews and commentary you'd expect from National public radio. One title I’ve recently discovered is Justin Cronin’s The Passage, a vampire book that makes Edward and Bella look like cute little kittens.
The second blog that I frequent that has been really helpful is the Shelf Life blog at Entertainment Weekly’s website [http://shelf-life.ew.com]. Not only do they give me all the great reviews that I like to help me pick a book, they also gave great pop culture tie-ins too. For instance, the final book in the Hunger Games trilogy was recently released, and Shelf Life is asking readers who should play the hero, Katniss, on the big screen. The blog doesn’t do just books either. It also features audio books, new releases in digital books, and graphic novels and comics. Two books I recently found on the Shelf Life blog were The Disappearing Spoon: and other True Tales of Madness, Love, and the History of the World from the Periodic Table of the Elements by Sam Kean and Hot X: Algebra Exposed by Danika McKellar. The Disappearing Spoon makes science and the periodic table both funny and cool, and McKellar’s Hot X makes math sexy again (if it ever was in the first place).
There are certainly many more books to browse through on both blogs, and there are absolutely other blogs out there, but these two give you a little bit of information about nearly everything. So keep an eye out for titles that pique your interest, and be sure to let us know what you want to read. We’ll be happy to oblige if we can.
--
Library of Congress Subject Headings
For over 100 years, the Library of Congress has been supplying subject headings to the collection. At first, it was in order to create a form of order for just the Library of Congress. However, as more and more libraries began to adopt the subject headings the LOC developed, the LOC began to expand the distribution of subject headings, first in volumes and supplements produced in book form, and more recently in Microfiche, CD, and online at Cataloger’s Desktop. The LOC subject headings are one of the most influential descriptors in the library, giving librarians a guide and controlled vocabulary for describing materials uniformly across all levels of library. Some, like Thomas Mann, are passionate about maintaining the Library of Congress’s work with subject headings and their continued use in libraries. Others, like Tom Steele, are advocates for other means of organization, like tagging and keyword search.
Recently, we have been looking at the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) as either the white hat cowboy or the black hat cowboy in everybody’s favorite Western movie. The group discussion has been centered on whether or not the controlled vocabulary of a given system puts one group at a disadvantage over another or in some way imposes a cultural attitude or worldview onto that group. I for one know that the answer to that question is decidedly murky. But there are some opinions that can be gleaned from librarians who are much more “in the know” as well as some answers to just how culturally demanding the LCSHs are.
To begin, it’s best to understand some definitions and then move onto the meat and potatoes of this argument by looking at the literature and seeing just what kind of impact these forms of description are having on society. Merriam-Webster’s dictionary (2010) defines hegemony as “the social, cultural, ideological, or economic influence exerted by a dominant group” (http://www.merriam-webster.com/). What this means for the purpose of this discussion is that some scholars and librarians argue that the very nature of a system that describes materials or classifies them into a given order ultimately pushes that system’s worldview onto the users of that system, whether they agree or not. I personally don’t agree with this notion, so I look forward to asking these two questions regarding LCSHs and cultural hegemony: 1. What prejudices do LCSHs exhibit? 2. What assumptions do LCSHs make about their users?
So, what do we see when we look for bias in the LCSHs? The first would be the idea that all subject headings fit neatly into a hierarchy. The way the subject headings work is that all subject terms can be found by following the branch from whence it started. Think of it like a really big “Animal, Vegetable, or Mineral” chart. This assumption submits that all subjects can be traced back up the tree. Olson (2004) states, “all headings are required to have a BT unless they fall into one of the five categories of ‘orphans’” (p. 613). This means that unless you are one of five very special categories, there ought to be a broader term as to what you are described. Another assumption Olson points to is that LCSH “presumes that all catalogers will think of the same hierarchies” (p. 613). While it is important to have rules governing a classification system, it is difficult to expect all librarians using the system to come to the same conclusion for any subject heading. The rules for subject headings is asking quite a lot of the library community go ahead and make the same assumptions about a where a book belongs in the branch. Now, while this is certainly asking a lot of librarians, is it hegemonic? Our definition for hegemony refers to influence being exerted over a dominant group. I would suppose that in this instance there is a little hegemony taking place in the LCSHs. I say that, because the rules are dictating that all headings be put on the tree with a line to follow them up. There is a hierarchy in place, and as soon as a hierarchy becomes apparent then there is chain of command to follow. This ultimately puts those outside the chain of command at a disadvantage. This might be imposing because sometimes there are no good ways to get a hierarchy in place. In those instances, the rules of subject headings ask us to find “intermediate headings” to go in place of missing links. It serves the subject heading by creating fewer orphans in the subject pool, but it also requires libraries to make judgment calls about topics that they might not understand or go along with past decisions about a topic’s home on the tree, even if new information or a new interpretation of the hierarchy can be found or argued.
A second bias of the LCSHs is that everything can be classified into a single heading. While it is true that a bibliographic record can contain many subject headings, it remains that there is an assumption that some book or DVD will contain at least one heading. Since the rules of LCSHs don’t allow for the creating of new subject terms outside of the LoC, this can be an imposition to librarian that wants to assign a subject term for an item that cannot be found in the big red books. What makes this assumption about subject headings a weak argument for cultural hegemony in the system itself is the fact that while the librarian is working with a designated, controlled vocabulary, it does not by any stretch require him to always and forever use it. The great joy of classification and cataloging in a library is that there is always the option to break away from the absolute hierarchical structure of LCSHs and instead add a subject heading that follows the librarian’s line of thinking in terms of placement and access. While the LoC probably frowns on not using the controlled vocabulary (as well as some proponents of LCSHs, like Mann) it also can’t be the subject heading police all the time.
The solution to these issues with LCSHs has been mixed. On the message board for class, some students feel that moving to a keyword search would be far less hegemonic because it would not be controlling the terms of the classification. Others have the notion that regardless of the use of keyword or subject heading, the whole system is a form of hegemony because it is a group of librarians and information specialists deciding where content belongs using a classification scheme. I’m on the fence. I think that there are definitely some problems that could be associated with using a given fixed vocabulary when trying to define something as organic as information, but at the same time, I feel that while any system has the potential to create a cultural hegemony, having no system at all would be a far worse fate. In that instance, while I can feel good that my subject terms are not dictating how my users should think or how they should access their information needs, I can’t find any of the materials my patrons need because there isn’t a clear means of access. It’s a catch-22 for librarians because there is no clear way to win. I personally advocate for the continued use of LCSHs only because to abandon the system now might mean chaos for the library yet to come.
The second question we must ask ourselves about the LCSHs is what kind of assumption do these headings make about the user, and in making those assumptions, how does it exclude members of a community? Thomas Mann (2000) notes that most users would be able find exactly what they were looking for if only they knew there was an encyclopedia (good naturedly called ‘the red books’) for exactly these types of searches. What I mean to say is that the Library of Congress Subject headings assume we know how to use them without any training. Or most specifically, the system was set up with few training wheels unless you know where to go for your information. If you don’t know about the red books then you don’t know how to navigate the subject headings and thereby are swimming in a sea of information with no guide to follow. Mann is not advocating for a removal of the Headings though. In fact, the article I reference is Mann’s attempt to teach others how to best use the LCSHs and the red books to find exactly the information that they need. For the most part, the assumptions made between the LCSHs and users come from the user perspective. Mann references an incident where a journalist was looking for information on Game Shows. The journalist was looking under the subject heading “Television” however, the correct subject heading was “Game Shows” and the titles and information found under the latter were not duplicated in the former (p 119-120). Users cannot assume that looking under the broad topic will result in finding materials under the narrower topic. While this might appear to answer the final question about how these assumptions affect users, it actually relates more to this topic because in making assumptions about the subject headings we are recognizing the assumptions the subject headings make about users.
Another assumption made by the subject headings toward users is that they cover everything we could possibly think of. This is in fact a pretty accurate statement, as far as the expansive collective knowledge of the Library of Congress, but since we’re only human, we usually don’t think in those terms. Tom Steele (2009) talks about how tagging and folksonomies could be used as a means to improve the searching capabilities of users with regard to LCSHs. Another point he brings up is that the problem with controlled vocabularies is their lack of consideration for the “human element” (p. 72). He notes a humorous quote by Cory Doctorow that says, “Metadata creators (even the expert catalogers) are lazy, stupid, dishonest, and self-ignorant.” Steele goes on to quote Doctorow about a particularly interesting passage that shapes the discussion we’ve been having in class the last week. Doctorow said, “Requiring everyone to use the same vocabulary to describe their material denudes the cognitive landscape, enforces homogeneity in ideas. And that’s just not right” (p. 72). Steele and Doctorow ultimately claim that because the LCSHs are governed by controlled vocabulary, it ultimately excludes those who do not fit the “cognitive landscape” and instead awards those who think like sheep and tow the company line. Steele posits that while tagging is no more perfect than a controlled system like LCSHs, at least with tagging there is the opportunity for more access points and search terms and an inclusion of the human element into the process of metadata.
A third assumption the LCSHs make is that they will continue to be relevant to librarianship. While I myself am a huge fan of the LCSHs and the red books, many other professionals in the field are writing about a changing of the guard. More and more, the talk of metadata is about social tagging and collaborative classification. In essence, a lot of social networky, touchy feely, “let’s all just do our best” cataloging. While Mann and his compatriots are urging everyone to keep with the old system of how things run, there are new ideas popping up and some really great innovations in subject classification. One that has been floating around a lot in the literature is LibraryThing. LibraryThing is a social cataloging and classification website. Users add their own materials to their “personal bookshelf” and that then links them to other users who own the same materials. But it doesn’t stop there. Just recently, there was a LibraryThing flashmob that cataloged the White House Library for the fun of it. It might also have been the added controversy regarding the Socialist reading materials one conservative blogger found on the shelves during his White House tour and the claim that Michelle Obama put it there, but journalists have determined that the collection was started back in the Roosevelt administration and was later overseen by Jacqueline Kennedy with the help of Yale Librarian James Babb. It was during the 1960’s over 1700 books were added to the collection (Lowman, 2010, Washingtonpost.com). The point is, when a group of individuals felt the need to classify an entire library, they took the project by the toes and ran with it until it was finished. LibraryThing not only allows users to create their own bookshelves or assist with the development of other, it also links people to ideas and to their notion of how those ideas are organized. If I tag my home library with a relevant classification scheme on LibraryThing, others can see it. They can copy my idea, modify my idea or tell me my classification system is the dumbest thing in the existence of man (after my Stretch Armstrong action figure). The point is that people are at the center of classification, not the Library of Congress. LCSHs assume that we’ll keep using the system because it’s the only thing that’s available. That was the case long ago when it was more cost effective to use what the Library of Congress put out instead of doing the original cataloging. Since the advent of the digital catalog, the need, or perhaps the reliance on the Library of Congress is not as strong. Librarians are now given the option of creating classifications and subject headings that are useful and good for the collection they manage and develop, not what some think tank of librarians say halfway across the country. I think the whole notion is best described by Guy and Tonkin in Mendes et al. (2009) that “despite these problems, some see the benefits of social tagging services as creating ‘the kinds of environments in which we can evolve metadata vocabularies in a natural way’” (p. 32). Is it a good thing? We’ll have to wait and see, but for now just think about how cool it is to be a librarian right now.
To wrap up, LCSHs are a great tool. Do they sometimes enforce a cultural hegemony onto society? Probably. Does the Library of Congress enforce a pretty large culture (over 308,000 subject headings and counting) onto society? Absolutely! The real question will soon become if this will even matter in five years? Tagging is a big part of Web 2.0, and library budgets are getting cut all over the place. Perhaps the LCSHs will go the way of the dinosaur not because of a cultural shift in librarianship, but because it became too costly to maintain. We shall see.
References
Olson, H. (2004). The Ubiquitous hierarchy: an army to overcome the threat of a mob. Library Trends, 52(3), 604-615.
Mann, T. (2001). Teaching library of congress subject headings. Catalog and classification quarterly, 29(1), 117-126.
Steele, T. (2009). The new cooperative cataloging. Library hi tech, 27(1), 68-77.
Mendes, L, Skinner, J, & Skaggs, D. (2009). Subjecting the catalog to tagging. Library hi tech, 27(1), 30-41.
Personal Quality: I'm super cheerful most of the time. If you saw me at NLA, you'd know me as the guy playing the "try and greet everyone" game. Howdy was my greeting of choice. And I can organize a fantastic potluck party when needed
What is your education/library/professional background?
I am a graduate of Midland Lutheran college in Fremont, NE with a bachelors in English. I currently work part time at Midland Lutheran college's Luther library as a rereference librarian, part time at Keene Memorial Library in Fremont, NE as a children's librarian and grant coordinator, part time as a preschool aide for Trinity Early Childcare Center in Fremont, and as a movie clerk for Family Video.
What is on your reading list? What are your favorites/your recommended/your want to read lists?
Right now I'm getting ready to read Born Digital: The First Generation of Digital Natives by John Palfrey and Urs Gasser. It's a study into the generation of students who were brought up with technology wired into the everyday life. I'm also reading Blackest Night comic book run from DC and Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Season 8 from Dark Horse.These are the first two series of comic book that have gotten me to buy the new issue every month. I recommend them both.
What professional journal or article have you read and would recommend? Why?
I have been reading School Library Journal an awful lot lately, especially their article "When Harry [Potter] Met Bella [Swan]," talking about the legality of fanfiction and if it is plagiarism or not. Another article that I've read recently deals with self censorship in the library. It was a fascinating look at how librarians will censor their own collection because they do not want to invest the time into fighting a challenge later. I like them because both articles tackle issues that librarians are dealing with all the time. How does a librarian support his student patrons who want to become writers without breaking copyright? Stuff like that would never cross my mind until after the movie studio and J.K. Rowling's lawyers and Stephanie Meyer's lawyers all rolled into the library to put me through the ringer.
What do you do in your “down time”? Your hobbies/recreation, how do you relax?
I'm what I like to call a rainy day knitter. I have a hat and a scarf started on needles at my house, but I only do about twenty minutes of work on it at a time. My hobby coming up in January will be the final season of LOST. You cannot even fathom how excited I am for that to come out. I'm also a fan of well written TV shows, cooking with cheap ingredients, and not cleaing my dishes.
What deep dark secret would you like to share?
I'm a librarian who blogs. I'm blogging about my library school experience. And another blog is about my day to day life stuff. and another blog with a friend of mine about our Midwestern perspectives on pop culture. I'm also terribly addicted to Entertainment Weekly. They are so smart. They are the reason I want a Masters in Popular Culture once I'm done with my MLS.
Name one of your personal or professional qualities that make you, or will make you, a leader in 21st century library and information centers.
Professional Quality: I have a passion for collection development. I came from a library that was diligent about having materials for everyone and ensuring that the newest, best materials were available to patrons. I make it my goal to whip collections into shape whenever I can.
What advice do you have for current Graduate Students?When you're sitting in class, it's easy to just focus in on what you're learning and then go home. Don't do that. Stay after class. Talk to your professors. Talk to the students sitting next to you. Make a study group or a book club or a "hey you've got homework due Friday" buddy. Librarians in the 21st century need to make more connections, not less. Start now, when you're all still learning the ins and outs of the profession. Friendships in Library school can make lasting partnerships in the real world that can benefit you as a professional and your community of patrons.I think the challenge right now for the field is coming up with ways of providing the same service as usual while administrations, city budgets and state funding are pulling your funding first and fastest in order to balance a budget. Libraries are trending toward a more open access approach to information as a means to curb this decline in funds. More libraries have a Facebook or Twitter presence and some libraries are leading the charge for digitization. It's a pretty great time to be in the library field. We're the ones playing with new technology and making it work for our profession. You kinda can't wait to see what someones going to come up with next.
What do you see as key future trends and challenges in LIS?I really want to be the librarian that people remember as being helpful and informed. I would love to say I plan to be the head librarian at some land grant institution or a City Library director with 15 branches serving a million people, but I'm content for now to be the guy that can find you the book or the article you're looking for and do it with a smile and a whistle in my step.
What do you think will be your legacy in this profession?
Any Last Words?
Get a Google account. Seriously. You'll need it more times than you think during the program. and it's awesome to have otherwise. Google Reader for RSSing all the library blogs. It's pretty much the coolest thing they do.